A Greener Way to Drink Wine? Try a Barrel.

  One Manhattan restaurant is cutting down its use of wine bottles — with bar-top barrels.

At Sojourn, a dark, candlelit restaurant on New York’s Upper East Side, two patrons — a man in a black polo shirt and a woman in a white, flowered dress — sit at a table near the bar and order two glasses of wine. Instead of opening a bottle, however, the bartender returns with two glasses filled with wine from a wooden barrel that sits atop the bar.

The barrel, from DeLoach Vineyards of Santa Rosa, Calif., contains roughly 10 liters of wine — slightly more than a standard 12-bottle case.

But the real advantage may be in the amount of energy saved — and emissions avoided — by using barrels instead of bottles.

According to Jean-Charles Boisset, the president of Boisset Family Estates, whose portfolio includes DeLoach, the barreling method reduces the carbon footprint involved in producing a bottle of wine by a factor of 10.

Inside the barrel is a replaceable bag made from recycled paper, which holds the wine. When the bag is full, it weighs roughly one-tenth of a case of wine packaged in glass bottles, which helps reduce the fuel needed to transport the wine to stores and restaurants. Using the barrel also renders raw materials such as glass, cork and labels — and the energy needed to produce them — unnecessary.

The savings in energy translates to savings in cost, too. Barrels, for instance, are more effective in preventing wine from spoiling, according to Stanton Du Toit, one of the owners of Sojourn. By using the barrel, Mr. Du Toit said he saves about 25 percent, or $30 to $40, on the equivalent of a case of wine.

Those savings can then be passed on to the consumer. A glass pinot noir from the barrel at Sojourn costs between $9 and $11, Mr. Du Toit said, while comparable glass from a bottle would cost at least $16.

But how does it taste?

Pretty good according to several customers (and the unrefined palate of a reporter).

“When people come in and ask about the barrel, their initial apprehension is understood,” said Mr. Du Toit. “But once they taste it they are surprised at the quality. The temperature control is great.”

DeLoach is not the only winery innovating on packaging.

As we’ve noted before on Green Inc., several companies are exploring bottles that use less glass.

Meanwhile, Red Truck, a Sonoma, Calif.-based winery, has been distributing wine in plastic “mini-barrels” on a limited basis since last spring.

Each mini-barrel can be recycled, holds the equivalent of four bottles of wine, and cuts the weight of the delivered wine in half, according to Katy Leese, a co-founder of Red Truck.

The company said it expects to expand distribution of the mini-barrels soon.

And MAS Wine Company of Cloverdale, Calif. has been distributing wine to restaurants in stainless steel mini-tanks, holding the equivalent of 15 to 20 bottles, for the last three years, according to Andy Woehl, the company’s president.

“Since that time,” Mr. Woehl said, “we have not used over 70,000 glass bottles.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

What is the big deal about this? Is this not just boxed wine?
We have, and I believe much of the world has been drinking boxed wine for years.
As for quality, there have been many reviews ranking various brands and types of wine.

the point is, chazs, that the barrel is re-usable. most boxes are not. duh.

Fo me in New York, the problem with ‘re-usable’ is getting the barrel back to the winery in California. So, when is my local wine shop going to stock bulk wine that I can re-fill from?

Is this available to consumers for purchase? I would love a barrel of my own, if I could send it back to the company when I was finished!

Tabitha-

Maybe you missed the fact that the bag within a box was inserted into the reusable barrel? Learn to watch a video. lol. The savings come from not using heavy glass bottles and everything else that goes along with making said bottle presentable.

I think the key here is that while boxed wine has been a standard in the grocery store, it hasn’t been readily accepted in restaurants or wine bars. The box and bag combination they are introducing in the video is larger than what you would find in the grocery store and is made from recycled materials. The barrel just makes drinking boxed wine more ‘palatable’.

So how does a barrel compare to a box of wine? The barrel looks better but does it do a more effective job of storing, preserving and transporting the wine? Is the recycled paper liner as effective in preventing oxidation from air as the plastic bag inside of retail boxes of wine?

How can it possibly be true that a case of bottles of wine weighs 10 times as much as the equivalent amount of wine in a bag?

Since the wine in an ordinary bottle weighs roughly 750g, therefore a bottle of wine (plus extra packaging) would have to weigh about 7.5kg = about 16.5 lbs.

@ah – the bag that the wine is in is what protects the wine, not the barrel itself. Once opened, the bag stays fresh for up to 6 weeks. The barrel is essentially a reusable pouring device for the bag and the wine does not ship inside of it so the barrel itself has no effect on preserving and transporting the wine, per se.

i dont know if this is the answer either BUT i can tell you i dread always having to waste perfecly good wine bottles

if, on average, i consume approx the equivilent of a 750 bottle a day, even occasionally buying gallon jugs and more typically 1.5 liters you could imagine what accumulates

i always save them up in a box in my foyer while i hope to come up with a solution, until i can’t stand to look at them anymore and out they go – about once every two weeks

i would love to have personalized bottles, four or so would do, which when empty, i would bicycle off to the winery, every three or four days, somewhere in Tuscany, of course, and the little old winemaker would fill them and cork them for me and i would put them into my reusable tote bag with a seperate compartment for each bottle

the other days in between i would pick up the bread and cheese and pasta

frankD

@huh – 12 bottles weigh without wine in them weight about 6876 grams (15.15 lbs approx) versus the ecobag without wine in it weighs 68 grams (0.15 lbs).

Kara,

Indeed it is plausible that, as you say, the empty bottles weigh ten times as much as the empty bag. But the article appears to claim that the full bottles weigh ten times as much as the full bag:

“When the bag is full, it weighs roughly one-tenth of a case of wine packaged in glass bottles, which helps reduce the fuel needed to transport the wine to stores and restaurants.”

Just buy boxed wine and, as they say in Jersey, fuggedaboudit. Many fine wineries are now distributing wine in boxes. It’s cheaper to ship and stays fresh longer. The barrel is just a publicity ploy.

Now if you really want a buzz, the Tuthilltown Distillery sells fine whiskey made from New York grown ingredients in custom labeled barrels ranging from 2 to 30 gallons. Support New York State agriculture while you party. It’s simply good citizenship.

Really?

So let’s see what is new here. This is the wine-in-a-box with some Californian marketing work.

To make it more palatable to those who worry more about the appearance of the wine than its taste, they’ve:

1) changed the outside shell from space efficient recycled cardboard to a large heavy, non-stackable, hard-to-refrigerate wood cask in hopes of impressing consumers,

2) changed the plastic liner to a paper one (presumably plasticized or waxed to remain waterproof).

Perhaps this is worth reporting as a noteworthy triumph of Californian wine marketing, but unless I’ve missed it, there’s nothing interesting here beyond that.

Steve’s correct, but it gets worse. If you actually look at the video even closer, you can see that he’s putting a Bag in the Box inside the barrel. The reality is that this is really a bag in the box in the barrel (say that quickly) and that it is not as green, therefore, as just a bag in the box.

Lifestyle change comes here, what a nice story. This is how to change our lifestyle more sustainable. 3R starts from here!!!

call me old fashioned, but i prefer my wine to not touch plastic too much…so recycled glass, a barrel or another kind of metal cask sounds good, pluckfastic even.

@huh?

Kara’s numbers reveal a multiple of 100x.

Surely, it is plausible that multiple reduces to 10x with wine in the bottle or container?

I find it surprising that the packaging that is the most “green,” the MAS mini tank, got the least amount of coverage. The other products have to be recycled while the mini tank is re-usable. I live in San Francisco and see MAS mini tanks all over the city at various restaurants, and the wine is great.

Doesn’t anyone see anything wrong about a $9 glass of wine from a box? I like the box but for $9/glass I can buy 6-8x’s as much good far stronger spirits.

Folks, the cask is missing most of the points entirely – as anyone who has ever made with a wooden cask knows, it’s got a life of 2-3 years life span and can break easily. The Mas Wine Company solution – sealable, cleanable, reuseable tanks – is the obvious way to go. Seems to me the best solution for reducing oxidation of wine, using existing distribution (beer folks who know kegs) and and is totally re-useable. I live in Sonoma County and see these Mas ‘mini tanks’ in bars and restaurants all over the place – the wine is tasty, waiters like it for convenience, and it looks cool on a bar. This beats a wooden tank hands down for storage.

We bought three mini-kegs of wine from MAS vino in June for a large 5 day reunion. It was a perfect solution to buying cases of wine in bottles. We drank every drop and it was so easy to set up- allowing friends to freely refill without much trouble. It keep our recycling content down. After the week, we brought the kegs and tap back to the local winery. Simple, easy and green. We were lucky enough to get local farms to deliver their seasonal fruits and vegetables as well as meat- making the whole event experience even more special. I suggest a MAS vino keg for any party. Its very cost effective – cheaper than buying $6/bottle wine at Trader Joes!

Boisset really seems to be focused on sustainability, green packaging, etc. Looks like they partnered with Wine.com to create a green gift and are giving part of the sales to EarthEra (//www.wine.com//V6/gift/99860/detail.aspx). I think eco wine solutions shouldn’t be overly complicated for now … we just need wine makers to commit to green practices and consumers to start demanding it by voting with their wallets.

Like others have said the MAS approach seems the best. Maybe not so much for home (except parties and stuff) but certainly for bars and restaurants that go through dozens of bottles of the same wine every night. It’s easier for staff, easily accommodates a more flexible wine program (quartino, half liters, etc.), and takes up less space. The biggest hurdle, unfortunately, is small-minded consumers who can’t see beyond the stigma of bulk wine, or put too much stock in the ancient rituals of traditional bottle service. Go MAS go!